Part A
5CEBA4F17C7N
Intel
- Lifecycle
- Active
- Stock
- 1200 PCS
- Package
- FBGA-256
- Series
- Embedded - FPGAs (Field Programmable Gate Array)
Replacement verdict
Compatible functional replacement candidate
The 5CEBA2F17C6N is a viable functional replacement candidate for the 5CEBA4F17C7N in applications where reduced logic density and a faster speed grade are acceptable. Both devices share the same Cyclone V FPGA family, FBGA-256 package, and 1.1 V core architecture, ensuring board-level compatibility. However, designers must validate logic capacity, timing closure, and thermal margins before committing to a drop-in substitution.
Logic Density
Validation required
Package Type
High match
Speed Grade
Validation required
Core Voltage
High match
Parts at a glance
Part B
5CEBA2F17C6N
Intel
- Lifecycle
- Active
- Stock
- 5923 PCS
- Package
- LBGA-256
- Series
- Embedded - FPGAs (Field Programmable Gate Array)
Key differences
Rows are prioritized by design impact. Highlighted values require attention during substitution.
Key electrical and mechanical differences between the two devices
| Parameter | 5CEBA4F17C7N | 5CEBA2F17C6N | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| Logic Elements (LE) | 49000 | 25000 | Determines the amount of programmable logic capacity available for implementing custom digital functions; a major factor in whether a design fits. |
| Total RAM Bits | 3036160 | 1382400 | On-chip memory capacity affects buffering, FIFO depth, and data storage needs; insufficient memory can prevent a design from fitting. |
| Embedded Multipliers (18x18) | 132 | 66 | Dedicated DSP blocks accelerate multiplication and signal processing; fewer multipliers can limit arithmetic-heavy designs. |
| Maximum User I/O | 128 | 128 | Number of general-purpose I/O pins available for interfacing with external devices; must meet system connectivity requirements. |
| Speed Grade | 7 | 6 | Indicates the device's timing performance; a faster speed grade (lower number) supports higher clock frequencies and tighter timing closure. |
| Package | FBGA-256 | FBGA-256 | Physical package and pinout must match the PCB footprint for drop-in compatibility. |
| Operating Temperature Range | 0°C to 85°C (Commercial) | 0°C to 85°C (Commercial) | Defines the environmental conditions under which the device is guaranteed to operate reliably. |
| Core Supply Voltage | 1.1 V | 1.1 V | Core voltage must match the board's power delivery design; incorrect voltage can damage the device or cause malfunction. |
Need help validating a replacement?
Send your BOM and application constraints for technical and sourcing review.
Full specification comparison
Use manufacturer datasheets as the final authority.
| Specification | 5CEBA4F17C7N | 5CEBA2F17C6N |
|---|---|---|
| Supplier | - | Intel |
| Series | Cyclone® V E | Cyclone® V E |
| Part Status | Active | Active |
| Number of LABs/CLBs | 18480 | 9434 |
| Number of Logic Elements/Cells | 49000 | 25000 |
| Total RAM Bits | 3464192 | 2002944 |
| Number of I/O | 128 | 128 |
| Voltage - Supply | 1.07V ~ 1.13V | 1.07V ~ 1.13V |
| Mounting Type | Surface Mount | Surface Mount |
| Operating Temperature | 0°C ~ 85°C (TJ) | 0°C ~ 85°C (TJ) |
Frequently asked questions
What are the 5CEBA4F17C7N and 5CEBA2F17C6N devices?
Both are Intel (formerly Altera) Cyclone V F-series field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs) in the 17 mm FBGA package with 256 pins. The 5CEBA4F17C7N is a Cyclone V E A4 variant with 49,000 logic elements, while the 5CEBA2F17C6N is a Cyclone V E A2 variant with 25,000 logic elements.
What is the core difference between the 5CEBA4F17C7N and 5CEBA2F17C6N?
The primary differences are logic density and speed grade. The 5CEBA4F17C7N offers 49,000 logic elements and a speed grade of 7, whereas the 5CEBA2F17C6N offers 25,000 logic elements and a faster speed grade of 6. Both share the same 17 mm, 256-pin FBGA package and Cyclone V E architecture.
Are the 5CEBA4F17C7N and 5CEBA2F17C6N pin-compatible?
Yes. Both devices are offered in the same 17 mm, 256-pin FBGA package (17 mm x 17 mm, 1.0 mm pitch) and belong to the same Cyclone V E device family. However, pin-compatibility should always be confirmed against the specific device pin-out files and the target board design before substitution.
Can the 5CEBA2F17C6N be used as a direct drop-in replacement for the 5CEBA4F17C7N?
Not directly. Although the package and pin-out are compatible, the 5CEBA2F17C6N has fewer logic elements (25,000 vs 49,000) and a different speed grade (6 vs 7). A design that utilizes more than 25,000 logic elements or relies on the timing characteristics of speed grade 7 cannot be migrated without redesign and re-timing.
What are the typical supply voltages for these Cyclone V E FPGAs?
Both devices require a core voltage (VCC) of 1.1 V, auxiliary voltage (VCCAUX) of 2.5 V, and I/O voltages (VCCIO) that depend on the configured I/O standards, typically 1.2 V, 1.5 V, 1.8 V, 2.5 V, or 3.0 V. Always verify the exact voltage rails and tolerances in the respective device datasheets.
Do both devices support the same configuration methods?
Yes. Both the 5CEBA4F17C7N and 5CEBA2F17C6N support the same Cyclone V configuration schemes, including active serial (AS), passive serial (PS), fast passive parallel (FPP), and JTAG configuration. Configuration bitstream sizes differ due to the different logic densities.
What is the operating temperature range for these devices?
Both devices are specified for commercial temperature range operation, typically 0°C to 85°C junction temperature (TJ). Industrial and automotive temperature grades are available in other ordering codes, but the C7N and C6N suffixes indicate commercial-grade parts. Confirm the exact temperature grade in the manufacturer ordering information.
Which device should be selected for a new design with moderate logic requirements?
For designs requiring fewer than 25,000 logic elements and faster timing closure, the 5CEBA2F17C6N may be sufficient and can offer a cost advantage. For designs approaching or exceeding 25,000 logic elements, or requiring additional DSP blocks and memory resources, the 5CEBA4F17C7N provides higher capacity. Selection should be based on resource utilization reports and timing analysis.