AD7891ASZ-1 vs AD7890AR-4

Esta comparação detalhada entre AD7891ASZ-1 e AD7890AR-4 fornece informações valiosas sobre suas especificações e principais características. Abordamos fatores importantes em detalhes, incluindo conformidade com RoHS, status REACH, série, estilo de montagem, tipo de encapsulamento e outras características relevantes. Apresentar as diferenças lado a lado simplifica a seleção de componentes, facilitando a escolha da melhor opção para sua aplicação específica.

Technical review by ETEI Component Engineering Source: manufacturer documentation

Replacement verdict

Not a drop-in replacement

The AD7891ASZ-1 and AD7890AR-4 are not drop-in replacements for one another. Although both are 12-bit successive-approximation ADCs from Analog Devices, they differ in input channel architecture, package footprint, and interface configuration, so a direct board-level substitution is not possible without redesign.

Different input architecture Different package footprint Different channel count Different interface configuration

Parts at a glance

Part A

AD7891ASZ-1

Analog Devices Inc.

Lifecycle
Active
Stock
5058 PCS
Package
SOIC-8
Series
Acquisição de dados - ADCs-DACs - Objetivo Especial
Part B

AD7890AR-4

Analog Devices Inc.

Lifecycle
Active
Stock
6793 PCS
Package
SOIC-24
Series
Acquisição de dados - ADCs-DACs - Objetivo Especial

Key differences

Rows are prioritized by design impact. Highlighted values require attention during substitution.

Key electrical and mechanical differences between the two devices

Parameter AD7891ASZ-1 AD7890AR-4 Why it matters
Number of ADC Channels 8 8 Channel count determines how many analog signals can be sampled; both are 8-channel devices, so channel capacity is equivalent.
Resolution 12 bit 12 bit Resolution sets the smallest detectable analog step; both are 12-bit, so measurement precision is comparable.
Sampling Rate 500 kSPS 117 kSPS Maximum throughput affects how fast signals can be captured; the AD7891 supports significantly higher sampling rates than the AD7890.
Input Type Single-ended Single-ended Input configuration determines signal wiring and common-mode handling; both use single-ended inputs, so front-end design is similar.
Supply Voltage 5 V 5 V Supply voltage must match the system rail; both operate from a 5 V supply, simplifying power design substitution.
Interface Type Parallel Serial (SPI/QSPI/MICROWIRE) The digital interface dictates how the ADC connects to the host processor; parallel vs serial interfaces are not directly interchangeable without redesign.
Package / Mounting 44-Lead MQFP (Surface Mount) 24-Lead SOIC (Surface Mount) Package footprint and pin count affect PCB layout; different packages require different board layouts and cannot be drop-in replaced.
Operating Temperature Range -40°C to +85°C -40°C to +85°C Temperature range defines environmental limits; both cover the industrial range, so thermal suitability is equivalent.
Reference Type External External Reference configuration affects accuracy and external component count; both require an external reference, so supporting circuitry is similar.

Need help validating a replacement?

Send your BOM and application constraints for technical and sourcing review.

Full specification comparison

Use manufacturer datasheets as the final authority.

Specification AD7891ASZ-1 AD7890AR-4
Supplier - Analog Devices Inc.,Rochester Electronics, LLC
Part Status Active Obsolete
Type Data Acquisition System (DAS) Data Acquisition System (DAS)
Number of Channels 8 8
Resolution(Bits) 12 b 12 b
Sampling Rate(Per Second) 500k 117k
Data Interface Serial, Parallel SPI
Voltage Supply Source Single Supply Single Supply
Voltage - Supply 5V 5V
Operating Temperature -40°C ~ 85°C -40°C ~ 85°C
Mounting Type Surface Mount Surface Mount

Frequently asked questions

What are the primary functional differences between the AD7891ASZ-1 and the AD7890AR-4?

The AD7891ASZ-1 is an 8-channel, 12-bit data acquisition system (DAS) with a parallel interface, while the AD7890AR-4 is an 8-channel, 12-bit DAS with a serial interface. Both integrate a track-and-hold amplifier, a successive approximation ADC, and a multiplexer, but they differ in their digital output interface and package options.

Are the AD7891ASZ-1 and AD7890AR-4 pin-compatible or package-compatible?

No. The AD7891ASZ-1 is supplied in a 44-lead MQFP package, whereas the AD7890AR-4 is supplied in a 24-lead SOIC package. The pin counts, pin functions, and PCB land patterns differ, so they are not drop-in replacements for one another.

What are the specified analog input voltage ranges for each device?

The AD7891ASZ-1 offers selectable input ranges of ±10 V, ±5 V, and 0 V to +5 V (with a 0 V to +10 V option depending on the model suffix). The AD7890AR-4 provides a fixed input range of ±10 V. Designers must confirm the exact range configuration against the respective datasheet for their specific grade.

How do the throughput rates of the AD7891ASZ-1 and AD7890AR-4 compare?

Both devices are 12-bit successive approximation ADCs. The AD7891ASZ-1 is specified for a throughput rate of 500 kSPS, while the AD7890AR-4 is specified for 117 kSPS. The higher throughput of the AD7891ASZ-1 makes it better suited to faster multiplexed acquisition applications.

What digital interface does each part use, and how does that affect system design?

The AD7891ASZ-1 uses a parallel microprocessor interface, which requires a parallel data bus and address lines. The AD7890AR-4 uses a serial interface compatible with SPI/QSPI/MICROWIRE, requiring fewer I/O pins. The choice affects board routing, microcontroller pin count, and firmware complexity.

Do both parts operate from the same supply voltages?

Both devices require a +5 V analog supply and a +5 V digital supply for their standard operating modes. The AD7891ASZ-1 additionally requires a ±5 V or ±10 V analog input range configuration depending on the selected model. Always verify the exact supply and reference requirements in the manufacturer datasheet for the specific grade.

Can the AD7890AR-4 be used as a direct substitute for the AD7891ASZ-1 in an existing design?

No. Because the two parts differ in package, pinout, digital interface (serial vs. parallel), throughput rate, and input range options, a direct substitution is not possible. Any replacement requires PCB redesign, firmware changes, and validation against the target system requirements.