ADS7807U vs ADS7800JU/1K

Esta comparação detalhada entre ADS7807U e ADS7800JU/1K fornece informações valiosas sobre suas especificações e principais características. Abordamos fatores importantes em detalhes, incluindo conformidade com RoHS, status REACH, série, estilo de montagem, tipo de encapsulamento e outras características relevantes. Apresentar as diferenças lado a lado simplifica a seleção de componentes, facilitando a escolha da melhor opção para sua aplicação específica.

Technical review by ETEI Component Engineering Source: manufacturer documentation

Replacement verdict

Compatible functional replacement candidate

The ADS7807U and ADS7800JU/1K are both 12-bit successive-approximation ADCs offering comparable resolution and parallel output architecture, making the ADS7807U a viable functional candidate for the ADS7800JU/1K in many designs. However, the two devices differ in package footprint, analog input range, and supply configuration, so board-level validation is required before committing to a drop-in substitution.

Resolution High match
Output Interface High match
Package Type Validation required
Analog Input Range Validation required

Parts at a glance

Part A

ADS7807U

Texas Instruments

Lifecycle
Active
Stock
7038 PCS
Package
SOIC-28
Series
Acquisição de dados - Analogo para Convertedores Digitais (ADC)
Part B

ADS7800JU/1K

Texas Instruments

Lifecycle
Active
Stock
4118 PCS
Package
SOIC-24
Series
Acquisição de dados - Analogo para Convertedores Digitais (ADC)

Key differences

Rows are prioritized by design impact. Highlighted values require attention during substitution.

Key electrical and mechanical differences between the two devices

Parameter ADS7807U ADS7800JU/1K Why it matters
Resolution 16 bit 12 bit Resolution determines the smallest analog increment the ADC can distinguish; a 16-bit part offers 16x finer quantization than a 12-bit part, so they are not functionally interchangeable in precision applications.
Sampling Rate 40 kSPS 333 kSPS Maximum throughput dictates the highest signal bandwidth that can be digitized; the ADS7800 supports much faster sampling, which matters for dynamic or multiplexed acquisition systems.
Input Type Single-ended Single-ended Input configuration affects how the sensor or signal source must be connected; both are single-ended, so wiring topology is compatible.
Interface Parallel (byte/word) Parallel The digital interface must match the host bus; both provide parallel output, but the ADS7807 offers byte-selectable word widths that can simplify 8-bit microcontroller interfacing.
Supply Voltage 5 V 5 V Supply voltage must match the system rail; both operate from a single 5 V supply, so power architecture is compatible.
Reference Internal Internal An internal reference simplifies the design by removing an external reference component; both include on-chip references, aiding drop-in substitution.
Package 28-pin SOIC 24-pin SOIC Package footprint and pin count determine board layout compatibility; differing pin counts mean the parts are not footprint-compatible and require layout changes.
Operating Temperature Range -40 to +85 °C -40 to +85 °C The temperature range defines the environments in which the part is guaranteed to meet specifications; matching industrial ranges support use in similar application conditions.

Need help validating a replacement?

Send your BOM and application constraints for technical and sourcing review.

Full specification comparison

Use manufacturer datasheets as the final authority.

Specification ADS7807U ADS7800JU/1K
Supplier - Texas Instruments,Rochester Electronics, LLC
Part Status Active Active
Number of Bits 16 12
Sampling Rate(Per Second) 40k 333k
Number of Inputs 1 1
Input Type Single Ended Single Ended
Data Interface SPI, Parallel Parallel
Configuration S/H-ADC S/H-ADC
Ratio - S / H: ADC 1:1 1:1
Number of A/D Converters 1 1
Architecture SAR SAR
Reference Type External, Internal Internal
Voltage - Supply, Analog 5V 5V, -11.4V ~ 16.5V
Voltage - Supply, Digital 5V 5V
Operating Temperature -40°C ~ 85°C -40°C ~ 85°C

Frequently asked questions

What are the key differences between the ADS7807U and the ADS7800JU/1K?

The ADS7807U is a 16-bit successive-approximation ADC, while the ADS7800JU/1K is a 12-bit successive-approximation ADC. The ADS7807U offers higher resolution (16-bit vs 12-bit) and is specified for a different package and speed grade, so they are not pin-for-pin or functionally interchangeable without design validation.

Do the ADS7807U and ADS7800JU/1K have the same resolution and sampling rate?

No. The ADS7807U provides 16-bit resolution, whereas the ADS7800JU/1K provides 12-bit resolution. Sampling rates and timing specifications also differ between the two devices, so each must be evaluated against its own datasheet for the target application.

Are the ADS7807U and ADS7800JU/1K available in the same package?

No. The ADS7807U is offered in a 28-pin SOIC package, while the ADS7800JU/1K is offered in a 24-pin SOIC package. The different pin counts and pinouts prevent a direct drop-in replacement.

Can the ADS7807U be used as a direct replacement for the ADS7800JU/1K?

No. Because the two devices differ in resolution (16-bit vs 12-bit), package (28-pin vs 24-pin SOIC), and pinout, a direct substitution is not possible. Any replacement requires schematic, layout, and firmware validation against the respective manufacturer datasheets.

What are the input voltage ranges of the ADS7807U and ADS7800JU/1K?

Both devices support bipolar input ranges, but the exact specified ranges and reference configurations differ. Designers should confirm the input span and reference requirements from the official Texas Instruments datasheets for each part before selecting one for a given signal chain.

Which part is better suited for high-accuracy measurement applications?

The ADS7807U is generally better suited for high-accuracy measurement because it provides 16-bit resolution compared with the 12-bit resolution of the ADS7800JU/1K. The final choice should also account for sampling rate, interface timing, and system noise requirements verified from the datasheets.

Do both parts use the same digital interface?

Both are successive-approximation ADCs with parallel digital outputs, but the data bus width and control signal timing differ due to their different resolutions and pin counts. The interface must be verified against each device's datasheet before reuse in an existing design.