ADS8422IBPFBR vs ADS8401IBPFBRG4

Esta comparação detalhada entre ADS8422IBPFBR e ADS8401IBPFBRG4 fornece informações valiosas sobre suas especificações e principais características. Abordamos fatores importantes em detalhes, incluindo conformidade com RoHS, status REACH, série, estilo de montagem, tipo de encapsulamento e outras características relevantes. Apresentar as diferenças lado a lado simplifica a seleção de componentes, facilitando a escolha da melhor opção para sua aplicação específica.

Technical review by ETEI Component Engineering Source: manufacturer documentation

Replacement verdict

Compatible functional replacement candidate

The ADS8422IBPFBR and ADS8401IBPFBRG4 are both 16-bit, single-channel, successive-approximation analog-to-digital converters in a TQFP-48 package, sharing a closely aligned architecture and pinout. While the ADS8422IBPFBR offers a higher maximum sampling rate and a wider analog supply range, the ADS8401IBPFBRG4 remains a viable functional substitute for lower-speed applications, provided the system timing and reference configuration are validated against the target design.

Sampling Rate Validation required
Resolution and Interface High match
Package Type High match
Analog Supply Range Validation required

Parts at a glance

Part B

ADS8401IBPFBRG4

Texas Instruments

Lifecycle
Active
Stock
3277 PCS
Package
TQFP-48
Series
Acquisição de dados - Analogo para Convertedores Digitais (ADC)

Key differences

Rows are prioritized by design impact. Highlighted values require attention during substitution.

Key electrical and mechanical differences between the two devices

Parameter ADS8422IBPFBR ADS8401IBPFBRG4 Why it matters
Resolution 16 bit 16 bit Both are 16-bit SAR ADCs, so resolution is identical and not a differentiator for substitutability.
Sampling Rate 4 MSPS 1.25 MSPS The ADS8422 offers over 3x the throughput, which directly affects achievable signal bandwidth and system timing budget.
Number of Input Channels 1 (single-ended) 1 (pseudo-differential) Input configuration affects how the ADC interfaces to the signal source and its immunity to ground noise.
Input Type Single-ended Pseudo-differential Pseudo-differential inputs reject common-mode noise better, while single-ended is simpler to drive; this impacts analog front-end design.
Supply Voltage (Analog) 5 V 5 V Both operate from a 5 V analog supply, so power rail requirements are compatible.
Interface Parallel (byte/word) Parallel (byte/word) Identical parallel interface simplifies drop-in replacement at the digital bus level.
Package 48-TQFP (PFB) 48-TQFP (PFB) Same package and footprint allow direct PCB substitution without layout changes.
Operating Temperature Range -40 to +85 °C -40 to +85 °C Identical industrial temperature range means both suit the same environmental conditions.
Power Consumption (Typical) ~155 mW ~100 mW Lower power in the ADS8401 benefits thermally constrained or battery-influenced designs, though the ADS8422 trades power for speed.

Need help validating a replacement?

Send your BOM and application constraints for technical and sourcing review.

Full specification comparison

Use manufacturer datasheets as the final authority.

Specification ADS8422IBPFBR ADS8401IBPFBRG4
Supplier - Texas Instruments
Series microPOWER™ microPOWER™
Part Status Active Obsolete
Number of Bits 16 16
Sampling Rate(Per Second) - 1.25M
Number of Inputs 1 1
Input Type Differential Differential
Data Interface Parallel Parallel
Configuration S/H-ADC S/H-ADC
Ratio - S / H: ADC 1:1 1:1
Number of A/D Converters - 1
Architecture SAR SAR
Reference Type External, Internal External, Internal
Voltage - Supply, Analog 5V 5V
Voltage - Supply, Digital 2.7V ~ 5.25V 2.95V ~ 5.25V
Operating Temperature -40°C ~ 85°C -40°C ~ 85°C
Base Product Number ADS8422 -
Sampling Rate (Per Second) 4M -
Number of A / D Converters 1 -
Mounting Type Surface Mount -
Packaging Tape & Reel (TR) -

Frequently asked questions

What are the key differences between the ADS8422IBPFBR and ADS8401IBPFBRG4?

The ADS8422IBPFBR is a 16-bit, 4 MSPS fully differential SAR ADC with a parallel interface, while the ADS8401IBPFBRG4 is a 16-bit, 1.25 MSPS pseudo-differential SAR ADC with a parallel interface. The ADS8422 offers higher throughput and full differential input, whereas the ADS8401 provides lower power consumption at a reduced sample rate.

Are the ADS8422IBPFBR and ADS8401IBPFBRG4 pin-compatible?

Both devices are offered in a 48-pin TQFP (PFB) package, but pin compatibility cannot be assumed solely from package type. The input configuration (fully differential vs. pseudo-differential) and internal reference/control pin functions differ, so the PCB layout and pin connections must be verified against each respective datasheet before substitution.

What is the maximum sampling rate of each device?

The ADS8422IBPFBR supports a maximum sampling rate of 4 MSPS. The ADS8401IBPFBRG4 supports a maximum sampling rate of 1.25 MSPS. Designs requiring higher throughput should select the ADS8422.

What input configuration does each ADC support?

The ADS8422IBPFBR features a fully differential analog input, which provides improved common-mode noise rejection and better THD performance. The ADS8401IBPFBRG4 uses a pseudo-differential input configuration, where the negative input is typically tied to a fixed reference level.

Do both devices operate from the same supply voltage?

Both the ADS8422IBPFBR and ADS8401IBPFBRG4 operate from a 5 V analog supply (AVDD) with a separate digital supply (DVDD) in the 2.7 V to 5 V range. However, power consumption differs due to the different sampling rates, so the supply decoupling and thermal budget should be reviewed per datasheet.

What interface do these ADCs use to connect to a host processor?

Both devices provide a parallel digital output interface for direct connection to DSPs, FPGAs, or microcontrollers. The ADS8422IBPFBR outputs 16-bit data at up to 4 MSPS, while the ADS8401IBPFBRG4 outputs 16-bit data at up to 1.25 MSPS; the host timing and bus width must be matched to the selected device.

Can the ADS8401IBPFBRG4 be used as a drop-in replacement for the ADS8422IBPFBR?

No. Although both are 16-bit SAR ADCs in a 48-pin TQFP package, they differ in sampling rate (1.25 MSPS vs. 4 MSPS), input configuration (pseudo-differential vs. fully differential), and internal timing. A drop-in replacement requires full validation of pin functions, reference requirements, and timing against the target design; consult the respective datasheets before substitution.

Which device is better suited for high-speed data acquisition systems?

The ADS8422IBPFBR is better suited for high-speed data acquisition because its 4 MSPS throughput and fully differential input support wider signal bandwidth and improved dynamic performance. The ADS8401IBPFBRG4, at 1.25 MSPS, is more appropriate for lower-speed, lower-power applications.